Churches increasingly serve people from diverse Christian backgrounds. Some members were raised Baptist, Catholic, Pentecostal, Methodist, Orthodox, Lutheran, or Reformed; others know little about denominational traditions. A thoughtful education program can help members understand these differences without encouraging rivalry or treating doctrine as unimportant.

"Seek first to understand, then to be understood"

The fifth habit in Stephen R. Covey's book, “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People”

Roger E. Olson’s The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity and Diversity offers a useful framework. Olson presents Christianity as a mosaic: distinct theological traditions contribute different pieces while sharing a recognizable Christian center. This approach allows a church to teach both unity and diversity.

1. Establish the Program’s Purpose


The program should not attempt to prove that every denomination is equally correct. Nor should it pressure participants to abandon their convictions. Its goals should be to:

  • strengthen understanding of historic Christian faith;

  • introduce major Christian families fairly;

  • distinguish central doctrines from secondary disagreements;

  • correct stereotypes and misinformation;

  • develop respectful theological conversation;

  • prepare members to cooperate with other Christians where appropriate; and

  • help participants understand their own church more clearly.

Olson’s mosaic metaphor can guide the program: Christian beliefs form an interconnected whole, even though Christians have arranged and emphasized individual pieces differently throughout history.

2. Begin With the Shared Christian Center

Before examining denominational differences, teach the convictions that historically define Christianity. These include belief in:

  • the Triune God;

  • Jesus Christ as fully divine and fully human;

  • Christ’s incarnation, death, and resurrection;

  • the Holy Spirit;

  • creation and divine providence;

  • human sin and the need for grace;

  • salvation through Jesus Christ;

  • the church;

  • resurrection and final judgment; and

  • the restoration of creation.

The Apostles’ Creed and Nicene Creed can provide helpful summaries. Olson’s discussion of unity and diversity shows why shared beliefs matter: denominational differences are best understood within the larger theological story of Christianity rather than as isolated controversies.

Church leaders should also explain that agreement on essential doctrines does not eliminate meaningful differences. Christians may affirm the same central belief while explaining its implications differently.

3. Organize the Course by Christian Families

Instead of covering dozens of denominations individually, group them into major historical families:

  1. Eastern Orthodox traditions

  2. Roman Catholicism

  3. Lutheran traditions

  4. Reformed and Presbyterian traditions

  5. Anglican and Episcopal traditions

  6. Anabaptist and Mennonite traditions

  7. Baptist traditions

  8. Wesleyan, Methodist, and Holiness traditions

  9. Pentecostal and Charismatic traditions

  10. Restorationist, independent, and nondenominational movements

For each family, address the same questions:

  • How and when did it develop?

  • Which people and events shaped it?

  • What sources of authority does it recognize?

  • How does it understand salvation?

  • How does it practice baptism and Communion?

  • How is the church governed?

  • What distinguishes its worship and spirituality?

  • What contributions has it made to Christianity?

  • What internal diversity exists within it?

Using consistent questions helps prevent the course from presenting one tradition as normal and all others as deviations.

4. Combine History With Doctrine

Denominations cannot be understood through doctrine alone. Their beliefs developed amid reform movements, political changes, missionary work, revival, persecution, migration, and cultural conflict.

A session on Lutheranism, for example, should connect justification by faith with the Reformation. A session on Methodism should relate John Wesley’s theology to revival, discipleship, and concern for holy living. Pentecostalism should be studied in relation to revival, spiritual gifts, missions, and the experience of marginalized communities.

Olson’s historical approach is valuable because it places theological beliefs within centuries of Christian reflection. Participants learn not only what Christians believe but also why particular questions became important.

5. Structure the Program Around Major Doctrinal Questions

After introducing denominational families, devote several sessions to doctrines that reveal both unity and diversity. Possible topics include:

  • Scripture and tradition;

  • the Trinity;

  • the person and work of Christ;

  • creation and providence;

  • sin and human freedom;

  • grace, faith, and salvation;

  • predestination;

  • baptism;

  • the Lord’s Supper;

  • spiritual gifts;

  • church authority and ministry;

  • sanctification and Christian living; and
    resurrection and the future hope.

For each topic, use four steps:

  1. State the broadly shared Christian conviction.

  2. Explain the major interpretations.

  3. Identify the denominations commonly associated with each view.

  4. Discuss practical consequences for worship, discipleship, and ministry.

This method reflects Olson’s treatment of Christian doctrine as a coherent mosaic rather than a list of unrelated propositions.

6. Create a Twelve-Week Curriculum

A church could use the following plan:

Week 1: Why Study Christian Traditions?

Introduce the program, its expectations, and Olson’s mosaic metaphor.

Week 2: The Historic Christian Center

Study the early creeds, the Trinity, Christology, and the gospel.

Week 3: The Early Church and Eastern Orthodoxy

Explore the church fathers, early councils, liturgy, and the Eastern–Western division.

Week 4: Roman Catholic Christianity

Examine authority, tradition, sacraments, ecclesiology, and spirituality.

Week 5: The Protestant Reformation

Introduce Luther, Calvin, the English Reformation, and Anabaptism.

Week 6: Lutheran and Reformed Traditions

Compare their views of grace, covenants, worship, and church life.

Week 7: Anglican, Methodist, and Holiness Traditions

Discuss the Anglican via media, Wesleyan theology, sanctification, and social ministry.

Week 8: Anabaptist and Baptist Traditions

Study believers’ baptism, religious liberty, congregational life, and discipleship.

Week 9: Pentecostal and Charismatic Traditions

Examine the Holy Spirit, spiritual gifts, healing, worship, and missions.

Week 10: Authority, Baptism, and Communion

Compare major positions on contested ecclesial questions.

Week 11: Salvation, Free Will, and Predestination

Introduce major Augustinian, Reformed, Arminian, Catholic, Orthodox, and Wesleyan perspectives.

Week 12: Faithful Conviction and Christian Cooperation

Help participants summarize what they learned and identify opportunities for respectful partnership.

7. Use Fair and Reliable Teaching Practices

A program about denominations can easily reinforce stereotypes. Churches should therefore adopt several safeguards:

  • Use official denominational statements whenever possible.

  • Let each tradition describe itself before presenting criticism.

  • Include qualified guest speakers from other churches.

  • Distinguish official teaching from popular practice.

  • Acknowledge diversity within traditions.

  • Avoid defining a denomination by its most extreme representatives.

  • Apply the same degree of scrutiny to the host church.

  • Separate historical description from theological evaluation.

Participants should be able to say, “I disagree with this position, but I can explain it accurately and respectfully.”

8. Use Multiple Learning Activities

Lectures alone are unlikely to produce deep understanding. Include:

  • readings from The Mosaic of Christian Belief;

  • selections from creeds and confessions;

  • denominational comparison charts;

  • moderated panel discussions;

  • interviews with local clergy;

  • visits to worship services, with appropriate guidance;

  • case studies involving baptism, Communion, marriage, or church governance;

  • reflective journals; and

  • small-group discussions.

One useful assignment is a “mosaic map.” Participants place core Christian doctrines at the center, major interpretations around them, and associated denominational families at the edges. This visually demonstrates both commonality and distinction.

9. Train the Facilitators

Facilitators need more than theological information. They should be trained to:

  • define unfamiliar terms;

  • recognize bias;

  • manage disagreement;

  • correct caricatures;

  • distinguish essential and secondary doctrines;

  • keep discussions relevant;

  • admit uncertainty; and

  • maintain the church’s theological commitments without misrepresenting others.

Before the program begins, facilitators should read Olson’s book together and agree on the course’s goals, boundaries, and discussion rules.

10. Establish a Discussion Covenant

Every participant should agree to:

  • listen before responding;

  • describe another position as its informed adherents would;

  • ask questions rather than assign motives;

  • distinguish disagreement from hostility;

  • avoid ridicule;

  • support claims with reliable sources;

  • speak honestly about one’s own tradition; and

  • seek truth in humility and love.

This covenant turns the course into spiritual formation as well as theological education.

11. Evaluate the Program

Assessment should measure understanding rather than mere memorization. Before and after the course, ask participants to:

  • identify major Christian traditions;

  • summarize shared Christian beliefs;

  • explain several denominational differences;

  • recognize common stereotypes;

  • describe their own church’s theological identity; and

  • evaluate their comfort discussing doctrine with Christians from other traditions.

A final project might ask participants to compare two traditions fairly, identify areas of agreement and disagreement, and propose an appropriate form of cooperation.

Conclusion

A church program on Christian denominations should produce informed conviction, not relativism; humility, not confusion; and charitable discernment, not rivalry. Olson’s The Mosaic of Christian Belief provides a helpful organizing image because it honors Christianity’s historic center while acknowledging genuine theological diversity.

When a church teaches members to understand other traditions accurately, it also helps them understand their own faith more deeply. The goal is not to erase denominational identity but to form Christians who can confess their beliefs clearly, learn from the wider church, and speak the truth in love.

Reference

Olson, Roger E. The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity and Diversity. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002.